Clinically significant and sustained pain relief1
PtAAP VAS change from baseline over time to 2 years (OC)1
OC: Observed case analysis of patients with missing data at a specific time not included. Open-label extension limitations: lack of a comparator past Week 16 and use of select study populations that were more likely to show drug effect.
BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W (OC): Week 16 (n=417); Week 104 (n=350).1
Placebo to BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W (OC): Week 16 (n=266); Week 104 (n=232).1
Baseline PtAAP score, mean (SD): 53.6 (24.3) in BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W patients vs 56.8 (23.2) in placebo patients.2
Randomized set; other efficacy endpoint not adjusted for multiplicity; nominal P value.
The PtAAP VAS or “Pain VAS” is part of the ACR core set of measures in arthritis. Subjects assessed their arthritis pain
using a VAS where 0 is “no pain” and 100 is “most severe pain.”1,3
PtAAP VAS change from baseline over time to 2 years (OC)1
OC: Observed case analysis of patients with missing data at a specific time not included. Open-label extension limitations: lack of a comparator past Week 16 and use of select study populations that were more likely to show drug effect.
BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W (OC): Week 16 (n=260); Week 100 (n=212).1
Placebo to BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W (OC): Week 16 (n=125); Week 100 (n=104).1
Baseline PtAAP score, mean (SD): 58.3 (24.2) in BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W patients vs 61.7 (24.6) in placebo patients.4
Randomized set; other efficacy endpoint not adjusted for multiplicity; nominal P value.
The PtAAP VAS or “Pain VAS” is part of the ACR core set of measures in arthritis. Subjects assessed their arthritis pain using a VAS where 0 is “no pain” and 100 is “most severe pain.”1,3
Sustained relief from fatigue1
FACIT-F change from baseline over time to 2 years (OC)1
OC: Observed case analysis of patients with missing data at a specific time not included. Open-label extension limitations: lack of a comparator past Week 16 and use of select study populations that were more likely to show drug effect.
BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W (OC): Week 16 (n=416); Week 104 (n=349).1
Placebo to BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W (OC): Week 16 (n=265); Week 104 (n=232).1
Baseline FACIT-F score, mean (SD): 37.8 (9.6) in BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W patients vs 36.0 (10.2) in placebo patients.5
Randomized set; other efficacy endpoint not adjusted for multiplicity; nominal P value.
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness: Therapy-Fatigue. Score range of 0 to 52.1
FACIT-F change from baseline over time to 2 years (OC)1
OC: Observed case analysis of patients with missing data at a specific time not included. Open-label extension limitations: lack of a comparator past Week 16 and use of select study populations that were more likely to show drug effect.
BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W (OC): Week 16 (n=260); Week 88 (n=217).1
Placebo to BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W (OC): Week 16 (n=125); Week 88 (n=106).1
Baseline FACIT-F score, mean (SD): 35.3 (10.5) in 16 BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W patients vs 36.3 (9.9) in placebo patients.6
Randomized set; other efficacy endpoint not adjusted for multiplicity; nominal P value.
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue. Score range of 0 to 52.1
Sustained improvement in daily physical function1
HAQ-DI score change from baseline over time to 2 years (OC)1
OC: Observed case analysis of patients with missing data at a specific time not included. Open-label extension limitations: lack of a comparator past Week 16 and use of select study populations that were more likely to show drug effect.
BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W (OC): Week 16 (n=417); Week 104 (n=350).1
Placebo to BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W (OC): Week 16 (n=266); Week 104 (n=232).1
Baseline HAQ-DI score, mean (SD): 0.82 (0.59) in BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W patients vs 0.89 (0.61) in placebo patients.2
Randomized set; other efficacy endpoint not adjusted for multiplicity; nominal P value. The HAQ-DI score ranges from 0 to 3.
A lower HAQ-DI score indicates an improvement in function.1
HAQ-DI score change from baseline over time to 2 years (OC)1
OC: Observed case analysis of patients with missing data at a specific time not included. Open-label extension limitations: lack of a comparator past Week 16 and use of select study populations that were more likely to show drug effect.
BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W (OC): Week 16 (n=260); Week 100 (n=212).1
Placebo to BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W (OC): Week 16 (n=125); Week 100 (n=104).1
Baseline HAQ-DI score, mean (SD): 0.97 (0.59) in 16 BIMZELX 160 mg Q4W patients vs 1.04 (0.69) in placebo patients.4
Randomized set; other efficacy endpoint not adjusted for multiplicity; nominal P value. The HAQ-DI score ranges from 0 to 3.
A lower HAQ-DI score indicates an improvement in function.1
Demonstrated efficacy over time in bio-naïve and bio-experienced patients1
ACR=American College of Rheumatology; FACIT-F=Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue; HAQ-DI=Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index; PtAAP=Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain; Q4W=every 4 week; SD=standard deviation; VAS=visual analog score.
References: 1. Data on file. UCB, Inc., Smyrna, GA. 2. McInnes IB, et al. Lancet. 2023;401(10370):25-37. 3. Nikiphorou E, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18(1):251. 4. Merola JF, et al. Lancet. 2023;401(10370):38-48. 5. Ritchlin CT, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(11):1404-1414. 6. Coates LC, et al. RMD Open. 2024;10(1)(suppl):e003855.