Superior results with BIMZELX
In head-to-head studies, BIMZELX was superior to COSENTYX® (secukinumab) (measured by PASI 100 at Week 16, and PASI 75 at Week 4), HUMIRA® (adalimumab), and STELARA® (ustekinumab) (measured by PASI 90 at Week 16 and PASI 75 at Week 4).
62% of BIMZELX patients were completely clear at Week 16 vs 49% of COSENTYX® (secukinumab) patients (primary endpoint)1
BE RADIANT: BIMZELX (IL-17A + IL-17F) vs COSENTYX (IL-17A) (NRI)1
Week 4
PASI 100 at Week 48: 74% (BIMZELX Q4W, n=147), 66% (BIMZELX Q4W/Q8W, n=215), and 48% (COSENTYX Q1W/Q4W, n=354) (P<0.001)1*
Sourcing: In this study, the secukinumab used as a biologic active control was sourced from 11 countries. Comparability between non-US-approved secukinumab and US-approved secukinumab has not been established.
Prespecified secondary endpoint adjusted for multiplicity.
Endpoints not adjusted for multiplicity. Nominal P value.
Prespecified secondary endpoint not adjusted for multiplicity. Nominal P value.
1.8x more patients achieved complete PASI 90 at Week 16 with BIMZELX vs HUMIRA® (adalimumab)2
BE SURE: BIMZELX (IL-17A + IL-17F) vs HUMIRA (anti-TNF-α) (NRI)2
Week 4
Week 16
IGA 0/1 at Week 16: 85% (BIMZELX Q4W) vs 57% (HUMIRA) (P<0.001) co-primary endpoint2
Patients who switched from HUMIRA® (adalimumab) to BIMZELX experienced rapid and lasting skin clearance
After switching to BIMZELX, ~88% of patients achieved PASI 90 at Year 4 (mNRI)2,3‡
After switching to BIMZELX, 59%-70% of patients achieved PASI 100 at Year 42,3‡
OLE LIMITATIONS: The open-label extension has limitations with a lack of comparator and the potential enrichment of the patient population.
Sourcing: In this study, the adalimumab used as a biologic active control was sourced from countries across North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Comparability between non-US-approved adalimumab and US-approved adalimumab has not been established.3
Prespecified secondary endpoint adjusted for multiplicity.
Endpoints not adjusted for multiplicity. Nominal P value.
Upon completion of BE SURE, patients could enroll in the BE BRIGHT open-label extension (OLE). Dose adjustments to BIMZELX Q4W or Q8W could occur at Week 56, and to BIMZELX Q8W at OLE Week 24 or OLE Week 48 and after based on PASI 90 response. Efficacy computed using modified NRI.
More than 5 times as many patients achieved PASI 75 at Week 4 with BIMZELX vs STELARA® (ustekinumab)4*
BE VIVID: BIMZELX (IL-17A + IL-17F) vs STELARA (IL-12/23) (NRI)4
Week 4
IGA 0/1 at Week 16: 84% (BIMZELX Q4W) vs 53% (ustekinumab) (secondary endpoint)4
Sourcing: In this study, the ustekinumab used as a biologic active control was sourced from 11 countries. Comparability between non-US-approved ustekinumab and US-approved ustekinumab has not been established.3
*Prespecified secondary endpoint adjusted for multiplicity.
†Endpoints not adjusted for multiplicity. Nominal P value.
Switching from another biologic?
Want more information about BIMZELX?
IGA=Investigator's Global Assessment; mNRI=modified nonresponder imputation; NRI=nonresponder imputation; PASI=Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; Q1W=every 1 week; Q4W=every 4 weeks; Q8W=every 8 weeks.
References: 1. Reich K, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(2):142-152. 2. Warren RB, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(2): 130-141. 3. Data on file. UCB, Inc.; Smyrna, GA. 4. Reich K, et al. Lancet. 2021;397(10273):487-498. 5. BIMZELX® [prescribing information]. Smyrna, GA: UCB, Inc. 6. COSENTYX® [prescribing information]. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. 7. TALTZ® [prescribing information]. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Company. 8. SILIQ® [prescribing information]. Bridgewater, NJ: Bausch Health US, LLC.